Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
I read on a reputable website that the nutrition in some areas is so poor that many babies don"t survive past the first year and that life expectancy is less than 50 years.feel terrible when I read these reports and my heart goes out to these people. I spent a month doing volunteer work in a village in western China last summer holiday and I saw these conditions with my own eyes.
I ask, “What should our priorities be?” Surely living people are higher priority than inanimate statues. It seems to me that the government cares more about appearances, having cities look impressive, than the lives of people. The money that is spent on public art projects should be stopped and diverted to humanitarian projects. education. agriculture etc.
Some people will assert that art is important in society. and I agree. it is. There will always be artists. My argument is that in a developing country we have to pay attention to the basics first. The issue here is whether public money should be spent on art and I don"t think it should. not when people are living (and dying) in poor conditions.
For the reasons I have outlined. I believe that the government has a responsibility to provide for the basic needs of people before it finances decorative art projects.
Sports cars arc an expensive indulgence.
priority 先,前,优先权
Financial security was high on his list of priorities.
inanimate 没生命的,单调的
A rock is an inanimate object.
divert 转移,转向
The course of the stream has now been diverted.

- 电话:400-0808-102
- 点击在线客服




















